Punitive Damages in the Context of a Fraudulently Obtained Loan

A recent decision of the Superior Court of Justice is instructive on remedies available to a creditor seeking default judgment on money fraudulently obtained by the debtor. The case of The Bank of Nova Scotia v. Rosario Rosado concerned a professional student line of credit advanced by the Bank of Nova Scotia to the Defendant […]

Canada’s Highest Court Considers Effect of Bankruptcy on Penalties Imposed Under Securities Legislation

Two general purposes underlie the bankruptcy regime set out in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (the “Act”):  the equitable distribution of the assets of a bankrupt amongst their creditors and the financial rehabilitation of the bankrupt.  The latter purpose is reflected in section 178(2) of the statute, which releases a bankrupt from all claims provable, […]

Recent Case Considers Lifting Stay of Proceedings Against Court-Appointed Receiver Manager

In the recent case of Intercity Realty Inc. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered a motion to lift a stay of proceedings that the court had previously ordered in the context of Pricewaterhouse Coopers Inc. (“PwC”) ‘s appointment as a receiver-manager. The case offers a useful summary of applicable legal principles. […]

Supreme Court of Canada Considers Fraud in the Context of Letters of Credit

We have previously written about letters of credit, which are common to financing transactions and are an essential form of security in the banking world.  The Supreme Court of Canada recently revisited the law surrounding such instruments, particularly how fraud can impact their enforceability. The case of Eurobank Ergasias S.A. v. Bombardier Inc. concerned a […]

Court Confirms Pleadings Are Merged in Consent Judgment For Purposes of Exceptions to Discharge From Bankruptcy

It is not unusual for judgment creditors to face the prospect of a bankrupt debtor.  An assignment into bankruptcy by such a debtor generally stays proceedings against them and, once the debtor is discharged from bankruptcy, releases them from all “claims provable” in bankruptcy.  There are exceptions, however, and creditors would be wise to be […]

A Review of the Tort of Conspiracy

When creditors bring claims against corporate debtors, they sometimes face the prospect that the debtor will have insufficient assets to satisfy any resulting judgment.  For this reason, creditors will sometimes cast the net of potential defendants as wide as reasonably possible.  In some situations, creditors may be able to name a broader group of parties […]

Guarding Your Digital Fortress Against Data Scraping

On August 24, 2023, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, in conjunction with 11 other global privacy authorities (“Regulators”), issued a joint statement (the “Joint Statement”) regarding privacy protection and data scraping. This blog post will provide an overview of data breaches and data scraping and explain the potential consequences of such privacy […]

Consequences of Non-Compliance with a Mareva Order

Injunctive relief, such as a Mareva order, is powerful in civil litigation cases. This type of legal remedy may be requested and granted in certain situations where it is appropriate to freeze a defendant’s assets before trial to ensure they cannot be depleted. To spend any money, the party must seek authorization from the court.  […]

Criminal Fraud, Civil Enforcement

In Ontario, fraud can be categorized into two main types: civil fraud and criminal fraud—the main difference lies in the legal consequences and available remedies to victims. While civil fraud provides a mechanism for victims to sue and seek compensation from the perpetrator, the primary remedy for victims of criminal fraud is restitution orders. However, […]

Claims For Fraudulent Conveyance Considering Rule 21 Motions

  The law of fraudulent conveyance in Ontario is a crucial area of law for individuals and businesses alike. It prevents debtors from hiding assets or transferring them to avoid paying money owed, which would be unfair to creditors. In a recent case, the Court of Appeal for Ontario was asked to consider whether fraudulent […]

Exit mobile version