Larger Limits for Smaller Claims

Many clients have smaller monetary disputes that initially may not seem worth the effort to enter into or continue with litigation. The practical realities are that such disputes soon eat up the legal budget. If it’s cheaper to pay than fight, you might as well pay or let it go. Is there an alternative? Ontario […]

The Northern Picasso and a Sale by Description

Introduction The deceased Anishinaabe visual artist Norval Morriseau was the founder of the Woodfield school of painting and became known as the Northern Picasso. He is perhaps the best known Indigenous Canadian artist of his time. The case below centres on one of his paintings, entitled “Spirit Energy of Mother Earth”, that claims to be […]

The Doctrine of Deferred Indefeasibility in Land Transactions

Introduction Cases involving two innocent parties involved in litigation after a fraudster has played and deceived them both are especially difficult. Each blameless party is now faced with a win-all or lose-all situation. This blog will look specifically at cases of this sort involving land, and how the doctrine of “deferred indefeasibility” comes into play. […]

Is There a Duty to Speak Up About Adverse Case Law?

Introduction A lawyer citing case law before an adjudicative body does so to provide authority to the adjudicator in support of their client’s position. An adjudicative body includes administrative tribunals as well as the courts. Case law can be binding or simply persuasive. Both types require relevance, meaning they must speak to the same issue […]

Issue and Action Estoppel and Abuse of Process

Introduction All forms and attempts at relitigating matters that have already been determined are considered an abuse of process. The doctrine applies to any attempt to challenge a previous and final judicial determination. It is a very flexible doctrine and is unencumbered by the requierments on parties that exist under the concepts of issue and […]

Unjust Enrichment by Wrongdoing & Waiver of Tort

Introduction The meaning of the term “waiver of tort” is by no means clear. At its strongest, it has been described as an independent cause of action that does not require the plaintiff to prove any damage suffered by them as a result of the wrongful conduct of the defendant. The remedy would be disgorgement […]

When will the Courts Hear a Moot Case or Appeal?

Introduction What happens to a lawsuit or an appeal when the issues in dispute are superseded or resolved by extraneous events? The proceeding becomes “moot” as a result of losing its practical significance. The legal outcome has been decided not by the court in question but by the incidental happenings. As a result, the court […]

Another Attempted End Run Around The Corporate Veil

Introduction We have written twice in the past about piercing the corporate veil. Despite the unambiguous language of the precedents referred to, these cases continue to pop up. In the case discussed below, it was clear the trial judge did not like the principal of the corporate defendant, who held the principal personally liable for […]

Considerations Regarding Partial Summary Judgments

Introduction Rule 20.01 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure sets out the procedure to follow when any party feels they have a good case for summary judgment. The Rule contemplates such motions being brought to resolve all, or only one part, of the claim or defence. The question that arises is when is the […]

The Importance of Putting Your Best Foot Forward

Introduction It sounds like trite advice to hear that a party must put their best foot forward on a motion for summary judgment. It is hard to believe this warning could ever be considered overused and consequently of little import, and therefore ignored. However, it continues to happen and most surprisingly by both plaintiffs and […]

Exit mobile version